Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 20, 2024, 12:37 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum
#2
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum
I always found it amusing that Behe had to put a disclaimer on his own bio at Lehigh U.

http://www.lehigh.edu/~inbios/faculty/behe.html

Quote:My ideas about irreducible complexity and intelligent design are entirely my own. They certainly are not in any sense endorsed by either Lehigh University in general or the Department of Biological Sciences in particular. In fact, most of my colleagues in the Department strongly disagree with them.

and that the Biology Department sees fit to denounce this horse's ass even further.

http://www.lehigh.edu/bio/news/evolution.htm

Quote:The faculty in the Department of Biological Sciences is committed to the highest standards of scientific integrity and academic function. This commitment carries with it unwavering support for academic freedom and the free exchange of ideas. It also demands the utmost respect for the scientific method, integrity in the conduct of research, and recognition that the validity of any scientific model comes only as a result of rational hypothesis testing, sound experimentation, and findings that can be replicated by others.

The department faculty, then, are unequivocal in their support of evolutionary theory, which has its roots in the seminal work of Charles Darwin and has been supported by findings accumulated over 140 years. The sole dissenter from this position, Prof. Michael Behe, is a well-known proponent of "intelligent design." While we respect Prof. Behe's right to express his views, they are his alone and are in no way endorsed by the department. It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has not been tested experimentally, and should not be regarded as scientific.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Kim - June 27, 2013 at 10:04 pm
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Minimalist - June 27, 2013 at 10:28 pm
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Kim - June 27, 2013 at 10:33 pm
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Kim - June 28, 2013 at 7:14 am
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Kim - June 28, 2013 at 9:52 am
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Cato - June 28, 2013 at 11:41 am
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Kim - June 28, 2013 at 11:46 am
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Kim - June 28, 2013 at 12:25 pm
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Cato - June 29, 2013 at 8:51 am
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Rahul - June 28, 2013 at 12:42 pm
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Kim - June 29, 2013 at 2:40 am
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Rahul - June 30, 2013 at 12:01 am
RE: Evolution of the the Bacterial Flagellum - by Kim - June 30, 2013 at 4:31 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution. Mystic 59 32404 April 6, 2013 at 5:12 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)