RE: Four questions for Christians
June 28, 2013 at 6:16 pm
(This post was last modified: June 28, 2013 at 6:20 pm by Consilius.)
(June 28, 2013 at 8:40 am)Rhythm Wrote:Can't find them. I guess this ends our wonderfully productive conversation.(June 28, 2013 at 2:37 am)Consilius Wrote: And the logical fallacy is…Reread the posts I conveniently numbered for you. I haven't suddenly decided to explain it all again.
(June 28, 2013 at 4:07 am)Ryantology Wrote:OK, I thought we were talking about morality in the Bible here. If your going to hit me with the your views on the historicity of the Bible (an entirely different debate that needs to be had somewhere else), then nothing's going to get done.(June 28, 2013 at 2:37 am)Consilius Wrote: If Adam's sin (a theological concept and not a historical assertion) makes it so that people live by a code of retribution, the principles of this code need to be channeled by the law of the God who is still the ruler of these people (the Jewish law). After centuries of this law, it comes to completion at a chosen time through Christ.
I'd say that's a pretty wonderful reason not to base legal codes on theological concepts. So much blood and suffering resulting from the real-world consequences of a mythical event.