(July 1, 2013 at 12:51 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(July 1, 2013 at 4:04 am)Inigo Wrote: My arguments have a god as a CONCLUSION. In other words, I haven't put god in, I've gotten god out.
So your presuppositions lead to a conclusion. But they're still presuppositions right?
Don't try to treat your god claim as equal to scientific method.
Science has a solid foundation of prior tested data, that is not presuming a fucking thing. Invisible friend claims however are naked assertions.
A history of believing in something fictional does not equal truth.
Scientific method and good logic work like this.
Prior tested and established data=tested and established formula=projected outcome
Imaginary friend claims(no testing required)<=made up excuses retrofit to cling to claim<=desired outcome
Imaginary friend claims do not hold a candle to science. Religions are nothing but childish mental toys. Science is the adult tool that allows us to discover and know the nature of reality.