(July 7, 2013 at 8:08 pm)genkaus Wrote: Then he should not be afraid to have his experiential justification tested. Show us the royal flush and we'll believe you.
This.
In fact, it's worse. We have a game in which every player claiming to hold a royal flush (which necessarily means that all but four of them are certainly lying) but none are willing to show their hands, insisting that they win this hand unless somebody proves that their hand is not a royal flush.