I have a sneaking suspicion the Indigo is trying to "win" this argument by simply having the last word. A tactic favoured by my dad who, in his mind, has never lost an argument by the filibustering technique of speaking louder and longer than anyone else
If Indigo had had a strong case then we would have seen some movement by now, but his argument is laughably pathetic and was destroyed in the first few responses.
If Indigo had had a strong case then we would have seen some movement by now, but his argument is laughably pathetic and was destroyed in the first few responses.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.