(July 11, 2013 at 4:29 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Wow, GC and Ronedee deserve some sort of medal for putting up with all of you because the excrement you guys are tossing out there is even deeper than usual.
::Takes a bow::
(July 11, 2013 at 4:29 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: 1. Genesis never says the Moon is a light source, so stop adding that language to the verse.
2. Genesis calls the Moon a light, which is completely valid, a light is simply anything that illuminates, and without the Moon there’d be virtually no natural light at night, so it does illuminate.
We added nor subtracted anything. In the Genesis account, the moon is referred to as a light the same way the sun is. Can you prove that this is not the way it was meant to be understood?
I liked all the articles though, and I especially loved the initiative to make those lunar lamps. Very nifty.
The thing many people forget is that, when you break it down, moonlight is still the sun's light. Are we really going to argue about that?
