(July 13, 2013 at 3:58 am)Godschild Wrote: Proof please, I've been asking yet have not seen it, post some names and the occasions when you have seen or heard omnibenevolent used by Christians.
Just gave it to you.
(July 13, 2013 at 3:58 am)Godschild Wrote: You are incorrect, God never interferes with our choice of accepting Christ as our savior, this decision is totally up to us, so what else would you call this than freedom to decide to exert our will upon a situation.
The government gives you the free will on deciding to smoke or not, you're not forced one way or the other, correct? However you are not free to exercise your right to smoke anywhere you desire, you are held accountable by laws.
Congratulations on missing the point spectacularly.
The government doesn't give free-will - we have it in our natural state. As in, if there was no government, we'd still have the freedom to smoke or not to smoke. The government - therefore - infringes upon that freedom in order to safegurad freedom of others. But then, the government never said that they wouldn't violate our free will.
Similarly, even if the baloney about Christ and god was true, then the freedom to choose Christ wouldn't need to be "given" - that's a choice we'd automatically have. That, as well as all the other choices possible. So, if you say that your god only allows us that one choice, then it means he is violating our free will in every other choice.
(July 13, 2013 at 3:58 am)Godschild Wrote: Please support you statement, omnibenevolence has been argued against by Christians right here on this forum. You should give me evidence that a lot of other Christians disagree with me on this.
See above. It shouldn't be my job to tell you what other Christians think - you should do some reasearch on your own. Nevertheless, I have done so.
