I never actualy saw such a rapebaby defender defend his possition in a debate.
Maybe because it is an undefendable possition for which no arguments a plausible.
Even here on this forum I never read any arguments by the religious which defend such a possition.
Maybe because it is an undefendable possition for which no arguments a plausible.
Even here on this forum I never read any arguments by the religious which defend such a possition.