My views on gay mariage

[kılıç_mehmet]

Infertile straight couples can get married and will not have children.

It doesn't matter friend, them being infertile or not. In that case, they can still adopt a child and raise a family that conforms with the standards that a marriage tries to archive.

Pretty soon cats will be marrying dogs. Oh, the depravity!

Mehmet, I cannot have children naturally. Do you object to the fact that I got married?

I do not. But you really try to miss the point, and instead throw the same lame arguments that you threw at me last time we discussed this.
"Oh what about those who don't want to have children", "what about those who can't have children"?
It doesn't matter, since the main object of the marital union is to form a family, a family brought together from two people who can procreate under normal circumstances.
However, science is there to solve your problems, and if it can't and you still want to raise a child, you can adopt one.
Marriage is there to propagate the traditional family, father, mother, children, this was the purpose when the institution was first created.
As a secondary purpose, it serves for legal share and use of property between the spouses, and of course, after a break up, such as a divorce, or even death, guarantee the economically weaker or living spouse a right on the property that was there before the breakup of the marriage.

However since I believe that gays only wish to marry for the second purpose, that is to share property legally, I believe that a seperate existence can be given to their "unions".
But marriage, no. Family, no. I believe that under no circumstances, should marriage be seperated from its main purpose, that is to create a traditional father-mother children environment, the basis of a family and indeed, the basis of civilisation.