I think someone brought up Q in Star Trek, that's a god concept pretty well executed. His abilities are so far above that of humans that it would qualify him as god-like. But you see, even the manifestation of such a being, if this being claimed to be god, he'd be rather convincing, but it isn't proof. Because he can just be an advance alien race. If we made a time machine and went back to 2500 years ago, show them iPads, how to perform surgery, antibiotics, they'd think we're gods too.
There's no such thing as supernatural, only things yet to be explained, and once explained, it'll be natural. God will have to be natural if it is to exist.
There isn't sufficient proof. If you think that makes me as unreasonable as a theist ... why? I don't believe in something that cannot be proven, why should I? Would you believe that you were created just 10 seconds ago along with everything else on this earth with your memory intact? You can't prove that you were and you can't prove that you weren't. But you will not believe one of those claims, does that make you as unreasonable as a theist? No, if you believe in it, then yea.
It'd be rather unreasonable for me to posit a proof that cannot sufficiently proof god and then claim that it does.
There's no such thing as supernatural, only things yet to be explained, and once explained, it'll be natural. God will have to be natural if it is to exist.
There isn't sufficient proof. If you think that makes me as unreasonable as a theist ... why? I don't believe in something that cannot be proven, why should I? Would you believe that you were created just 10 seconds ago along with everything else on this earth with your memory intact? You can't prove that you were and you can't prove that you weren't. But you will not believe one of those claims, does that make you as unreasonable as a theist? No, if you believe in it, then yea.
It'd be rather unreasonable for me to posit a proof that cannot sufficiently proof god and then claim that it does.
