RE: Free will Argument against Divine Providence
July 28, 2013 at 10:40 am
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2013 at 10:41 am by genkaus.)
(July 28, 2013 at 10:24 am)Chuck Wrote: This argument is silly. The attributes of "god" has always been made intentionally slippery and laced with double speak so domineering theists can shift it to cower the gullible whenever they feel the urge, and defensive theists can slide the goal post whenever their apologetics open them to too much ridicule.
You can argue against any appearently interpretation of what theists say about their god, and tomorrow the theists will change the interpretation so as to lead you on another goose chase.
Agreed. But if you choose to engage in that debate today, then you should be familiar with attributes currently being applied.
(July 28, 2013 at 10:28 am)Red Celt Wrote: Theology: the debate over the colour of a unicorn's horn.
That debate has already been settled.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicorn_horn
