Socialism is Psychopathic.

[Koolay]

If you think about government/socialism, it is simply psychopathic.

The idea is that it is 'unfair' for people to own more resources than others, the 'solution' is to initiate force against them to take the resources. If you apply this principle to anything else, it becomes downright evil.

Someone is more athletic than the average person
> It is unfair to be more athletic than the majority, let's break some of his/her limbs depending on how fit he is to make things equal.

Someone is more physically attractive than the majority
> It is unfair for people to be more attractive than the majority, so let's disfigure his face/body to make things equal.

Someone is a better piano player than the majority of people.
> Let's break his/her fingers to make things more equal.

Someone has a higher IQ than the majority of people.
> Let's give him a blows to the head to make things equal.

Someone has more wealth than the majority
> Let's take half of his money and threaten to throw him in a cage and confiscate his possessions at gun point if he doesn't pay up.

You see how absolutely evil and absurd all of this is? Sure it is unfair, but so what? that is no excuse for aggression.

'Equality' and 'Fairness' just seems to be made up words to falsely justify violence against others to appease the narcissism of the masses.

Discuss.

I don't think you're an idiot exactly but you have HUUUUGE flaws in you're logic, massive gaps in the way you're logic works.

Now I'm not saying taking peoples possessions because they own more is right but there's a huge difference between harming someone physically because they have good genetics and the fair distribution of material goods.

The main and very obvious difference is that material goods CAN be distributed fairly with an advantage to everyone who doesn't have very much and without much of a disadvantage to the person who did have an unfair amount.

Genetic biological superiority isn't something that can be shared by two living people in this sense, in the sense if I have good eye sight and you have bad eye sight I can't give you a bit of my eye sight to make it better, you taking my eye sight to make things equal would be purely negative, where as equal sharing isn't negative.

So what? So if I cut off a hair models hair it becomes wrong? but if I use it for a hair transplant it becomes good?

It's just stealing, and it is wrong. It's not sharing, that would imply voluntarism.

---

Government may be manmade, but it's necessary. Government isn't evil, but the men running it can be. Revolutions take care of these evil men (or in some cases evil men rise up to power), and this is simply how we operate in this world. If we got rid of government, the world would fall to shambles, for government is the foundation of civilization, and how can we be civilized without it?

Government is contradictory and evil by definition, it oppresses the people and takes away their freedom since it breaks the non aggression principle.

People have always justified evil things by calling it 'a necessary evil'

"Slavery is not perfect, but it's the best we have"

"Monarchy is not perfect, but it's the best we have"

Socialism/Government is just another phase of humanity's primitive past, you will do well to stop colluding with evil. History will remember you as some spineless peon that willingly wiped the boots of his master.