The book reviews say good things about the relation of ancient astrological myth to that of the written bible. I find that I would be more sold on my interest in astrology than the bible. Maybe the astrology needs to be marketed with more vigour and those relevancies in modern life. I like that I can read the book within 70,000 words which means it would be a very swift re-read, less the content laden properties you mentioned earlier.
I hear that you learned a lot about astrology and the constellations through study and writting this book but I'm wondering if your book delivers this information so that I am able to understand the constellations as well as you, or whether the book's focus will remain centred on biblical stories relation to the solar systems myths embedded in the bronze age, etc.
I suppose I really want to know what "proportion" of the text deals with astronomy compared with the bible (I understand the difficulty in the question - especially as a writer), I'm Not trying to sound critical or forming an opinion against your book, just want to know what sort of read it will become if my interest in mostly in astronomy.
I hear that you learned a lot about astrology and the constellations through study and writting this book but I'm wondering if your book delivers this information so that I am able to understand the constellations as well as you, or whether the book's focus will remain centred on biblical stories relation to the solar systems myths embedded in the bronze age, etc.
I suppose I really want to know what "proportion" of the text deals with astronomy compared with the bible (I understand the difficulty in the question - especially as a writer), I'm Not trying to sound critical or forming an opinion against your book, just want to know what sort of read it will become if my interest in mostly in astronomy.
Coming soon: Banner image-link to new anti-islam forum.