Here is a interesting thought

[Michael Schubert]

Yes, science's key principle is observation, and there is no evidence to date of an organism that was created by an intelligent mind.

If there were then how would we recognise it?

That burden of proof is on you. No one has proved that to anyone so far. You are the one asserting that there is a God.

If there are no ways of proving that an intelligent mind made an organism at this time, then your argument at this time is invalid.

---

All gods are accepted on faith.

noope.

All gods are indeed accepted on faith. That is common knowledge that everyone knows. Faith is something you hold independent of evidence, and until you or anyone else can prove a supreme being exists, he/she/it/they must be accepted on faith.

---

We look at something like a painting, and we know through evidence that it was created by an intelligent mind. We look at a tree or a plant, and we know through evidence that they are naturally occurring.

because why??? someone smarter than you said that what he believes? If they are naturally occouring then why haven't we found any on any of the moons or planets we have studied?

Do you have any examples of a tree that was made by an intelligent mind? Do you have any examples of a painting that was naturally occurring? The earth and the moon are completely different planets, and we have no evidence to date based on the research anyone has done of plant life or intelligent life on it.

Palentologists have found many, many dinosaur bones, and we know what they looked liked because of their fossils' shapes. All you have to do is go to a museum to see this. We know what the stegosaurus, the triceratops, they tyrannosaurus rex, and many, many others looked like as well.