This reeks of so much bullshit, but the first obvious hint comes with the hot and cold, light and dark questions. I could see a teacher saying yes, hot and cold exist without seeing that the Christian is trying to make the point one is merely the absence of the other, but after being schooled on that, do you think that even the most low-level phsycis teacher would fall for the same trap with the light and darkness question?
What's so amazing to me is that it's not enough for Christians to have a story that confirms their beliefs. It has to be embellished to the point of impossiblity as to demonstrate the true glory of their beliefs.
What's so amazing to me is that it's not enough for Christians to have a story that confirms their beliefs. It has to be embellished to the point of impossiblity as to demonstrate the true glory of their beliefs.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
