(August 4, 2013 at 7:36 pm)Creed of Heresy Wrote:(August 4, 2013 at 10:18 am)Red Celt Wrote: Uhm, your pro-Zimmerman dogmatism is getting in the way when you claim that anti-Zimmerman people are being dogmatic.
I wouldn't be so quick to try and preach logic here. I didn't say that calling a liar a liar is hypocritical. I said that calling one liar a liar whilst not calling another liar a liar... that's hypocritical. OK? OK.
Say the words: "Zimmerman is a liar". Go on, you can do it. It isn't as if you're guilty of dogmatism, or anything, is it? Is it?
LOL
Yes. My pro-Zimmerman dogmatism. That's why earlier in this thread I was actually sounding just like you. Until I was provided information that the media had been keen to gloss over.
No, do go on about dogmatism, tell me more about it.
All of my information came from researching the facts, not the media. It wasn't very big in the media over here. There was a mention when it happened and a mention after the verdict. I just looked for the facts. You should try that some time. Most interestingly, compare the timing of the events with what Zimmerman said happened. And when. Then remember, with him being a liar, that so many people in this thread have been using Zimmerman's statements as if they were the truth... and that the only other witness is dead.
Or you can dogmatically stick to your current position. Your call.