the problem with the "kind" argument of creationism is that they're unable to define what a "kind" is. The idea of a "kind" stems from ignorance of how evolution works, they expect one modern species to magic into another modern species, so they call it "kind" or some shit. But I don't think anyone's defined what it is. Is it reptile to mammals? The difference between ducks and chickens? The abilities to do certain things like fly, swim, breathe underwater and whatnot? They haven't defined it, have they? They just go, oh we mean like, a duck won't turn into a frog. Yea? And who said it would?
They also do not seem to realize that even if they prove evolution false, we're certainly not going to start opening departments of creationism in university.
They also do not seem to realize that even if they prove evolution false, we're certainly not going to start opening departments of creationism in university.
