RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 9, 2013 at 5:27 pm
(This post was last modified: August 9, 2013 at 5:36 pm by fr0d0.)
(August 9, 2013 at 5:10 pm)Chas Wrote: Not empirical evidence, objective evidence.
Please explain the difference for us
(August 9, 2013 at 5:21 pm)Chas Wrote: All the other putative paths have never produced any knowledge; ideas, yes - knowledge, no.
Really?
Microwave? Radio wave? Dawkins stated that both owed their existence to theoretical science iirc. How about black holes, higgs boson. Where will string theory lead? How about dimension theory? I'm no scientist. I just find the stuff to be genius. Why dismiss a whole genre of thought? Why not be in impartial rather than what seems to be off hand dismissive? You can't even answer the question. Instead you're straight into denial. Not impressed.