(August 11, 2013 at 12:07 am)Locke Wrote:(August 10, 2013 at 11:40 pm)Chas Wrote: Sure, except the Bible is self-contradictory, unsupported by independent sources, and the alleged fulfilled prophecies are not supported.
So it is rational to dismiss it as evidence of anything real.
You're wrong on all three accounts - otherwise I wouldn't have reason to follow it
History, Biblical scholarship, textual criticism, archeology all prove your assertions incorrect.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
