Unconventional Religion

[genkaus]

Notice the singular: PART. You have one verse as evidence for your view. I have a hundred.

Notice "part" does not mean "verse". All the verses advocating poverty would be categorized as ONE part.

So all children and the poor and are sad?

Poor, yes. Children - not so much.

The question remains: Why did you stop in the first place, no matter how little the loss you may suffer? You WOULD have expected something in return?

Exactly. I would expect something in return.

And how does the loss of the life of a friend or a child affect your own?

Negatively.

You took what was yours away from you.

It is impossible to take what is mine away from myself, you moron.

But, in the conditions, whoever you take your resource from SHOULD have it in his or her condition by merit needing it to survive and being deserving of it as another human being.

If its my resource then I'm not taking it from them. Needing something survive does not give you any merit to it. You are not deserving of anything or everything you may need to survive simply due to being a human being.

---

The thing here, Chas, is that genkaus deals on very physical terms.

Emotions are a part of physical reality

From what I've gathered here, genkaus' bank account remains the same size and he continues to breathe even after all of his loved ones are gone, which should be good enough for him.

If that's what you've gathered, then you've understood nothing.