(August 12, 2013 at 12:16 pm)Drich Wrote:(August 12, 2013 at 12:04 pm)Chas Wrote: If someone knew things about my life that they couldn't possibly have humanly known, then that would be evidence of something non-human.
But it would not be evidence of any particular god.
...and if this 'non-human' said he was to deliver that message from God?
That was the point of the Mircials Christ performed. I was to establish His authority with out question or doubt as to who He was (Son of God) and what He said was true. Fore, who could do what was done and say He was God, and not be of God? If there was a power and authority greater than the 'mirical worker' himself, and the 'mirical worker' was not from God/The power authority greater than the Mirical worker, then why would God allow the Mirical worker to Change anything God established?
This is what got the the pharasees in trouble in Mark 3. They saw the 'proof' Christ offered, and tried to say his power was from Satan, rather than God. In essence saying Saying Satan was greater, and that he was at war with himself.
I was answering your argument - why are you shifting the argument?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
