Unanswered questions

[Drich]

How is homosexuality a sexual sin?

if you discount everything the bible says openly against it, there still is not a Santified pretext in which homosexual sex is permitted before God. God has only allowed sexual activity between man and woman through the covenant of marriage. There is no covenantal examples of same sex marriage. If there is not a Santified pretext in which homosexual sex can take place then it is classified as a sexual sin like every other sexual sin one commits against his body.

All homosexuality describes is an inclination towards the same sex.

Not according to merrium-Webster http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/homosexuality it allows for either interpretation. Yours was a weak attempt in conversational control. Play nice or we will spend hours splitting hairs.

Do you like Lesbian porn,

No.

or does your porn have to have heterosexual intercourse only?

beggs the question.

How do you feel about threesomes?

I have trouble finishing a two some with my wife with out wanting to go to sleep afterward. I would not want to have to ride one horse into the ground, then jump off and hop on to another.

I'm circumcised. Did anyone ask me if I wanted that?

are you sure no one did? What is your answer based on your memory?

I'm stuck with a mutilated dick for life, and I've learned to do very well with what I have. I accept that I'm circumcised. This may not be the most apt analogy, but I can tell you that if you try to go against a sexual tendency, there is bound to be psychological damage. Same kinda goes for me if I were to dwell on the fact that I'm circumcised...trying to go against this fact does me no good in the end.

So, by your logic if and when EVER we go against our 'sexual tendencies' we are doomed to psychological damage? What if my sexual tendency was toward married women? Or female celiberities, or some other current social taboo or unrealistic out of reach pairing? What if I had 'scarlet Johanson' taste with your looks, and a homeless man's budget? Would I be doomed to mental instability just because I didn't get to sleep with the actress I wanted to? No of course not. Growing up it was brook shields and Cindy Crawford. All but a handful of guys got to go there, and the sanity of the majority of the world population of men who grew up in the 80's with pictures or posters of either of those two on the wall is in tact.

It wasn't till the last ten or so years that we were told that it is our obligation to stick your dick in anyone/anything that will hold still long enough for you to do it. As per the current societal decline I would say this new philosophy where one sticks anything that he wants is the source of all instability we are currently experiencing.

Why didn't you just say this at first? So you would disown him/her for sexual tendencies that weren't up to snuff with your bible, even though science proves that homosexuality is not a sickness, but a biological fact (just like my circumcision).

Ah no. You appearently do not understand what it is to be disowned, in relation to what I have described here. Keep reading.

The story of the Prodigal Son wasn't about disowning the child.

exactly! It's about a child leaving his father's house (badly) or choosing a life style not consistent with how the father has chosen to expose his family to. Staying Gone till his lifestyle choice consumed him and spit him out when there was nothing more to take. Leaving him for the pigs. This is the key difference between being disowned and choosing to leave. If one chooses to leave, he has the option to come back. Where as a disowned child does not have that option.

As for the heterosexual sin of pre-marital sex or heterosexual fornication, I wonder what Jesus would think about you disowning your teenage daughter because she got pregnant?

again not disowned. I am giving her and her baby daddy an oppertunity to be the adults they were pretending to be. When there pride runs out they will return.

What's that story in the Gospel of John about Jesus saving the Hooker from being stoned, and then forgiving her on the spot?

this has nothing to do with what is being discussed.

Are you saying this doesn't count?

what does stoning not allow for that allowing a prodigal go and come back on his/her own does? Here's a hint. Once you stone someone they are dead.

Allowing a prodigal to be consumed by their choices wil sift the sheep from the goats, the wheat from the weeds. If the prodigal's pride will allow him/her to return then you have a real chance of reaching them in a way that you could not do before. If they do not return, then it is better that you know where they stand now, than add 10 years of unwanted preaching and lectures that will only serve to further callous and harden their heart toward you and God.

Anyway, it's amazing how un-biblical you actually are despite your heavy Bible thumping, for all the good it does.

its almost cute the way you guys earnestly think that a few hundered Sunday schools worth of bible knowledge (Im being generous) somehow places you in an authoritive position to not only accurately divide and repersent the word, but to put you in a place to rebuke someone who say has a few more Sunday schools worth of study behind them.

This is the point I was trying to make about you, and you played right into my hands.

awwwe.

I can rightfully say that you are scum for acting as so many other so-called Christians would when confronted with sexual sin and homosexuality. You are a bigot, a hypocrite, and crummy human being.

intolerant of intolerance and the intolerant is the only acceptable intolerance allowed in western soceity! That and intolerance of Christians in general... When you find an 'intolerant Christian' well that is like hitting the lottery, then you can say and do what ever you like, and you will be look up to by your peers.. Kinda like how the kkk was looked up to for protecting white women from the 'evil' black man... But, now instead of skin color the accepted intolerance is based off of belief. Which is better than something as trivial as skin color (so long as all of the various shades of brown think as you do, am i right?) good job old sport!

If you don't follow your Lord Jesus, then who is it that you follow? Pastor Fred? Well, it's apparent that he doesn't speak for Jesus either.

but, you who claim there is no God some how can navigate the whole bible better than men like 'pastor Fred' who have been formally educated and has given the lions share of his life to discerning God's word???

Do you not see the fatal flaw in you logic?

But then it's hard to speak for someone who may never have existed in the first place...but that's another conversation.

Ah, the obligatory reminder/self assurance that even if I can dispel everything you said here you can default to the core of your new system of belief, and everything will be made well.