Scientific method proves order cannot exist w/o intelligence

[tackattack]

belief definately as of this moment. Nor did I say your reality A897. I said my perception of reality which is subjective and not viable for scientific evidence, but it is valid for non-substantial evidence. We can only percieve God with the tools we have available which are logic, reality, etc. I think the argument is moot because Atheists, in general, are looking for physical evidence of something insubstantial. I believe that there is more to life than the reality of the chair I'm sitting in and the computer I'm typing. IMO, there is an insubstantial reality of toughts, ideas, beliefs, forces outside of ourselves, will, spirits etc that also exists and I think that is the main difference between a theist and atheist. Is that far off from the definition, because I'm still learning atheist and agnostic definitions?