Unanswered questions

[Cyberman]

1)Making a statement and putting it in question form is not an actual question. Your 'questions' at best were rhetorical.

I asked:

"what's the problem with allowing same-sex couples to marry, get their relationship recognised officially and then express whatever damn feelings they want without offending the followers of a misbegotten mythology?"

Clothed in rhetorical devices perhaps, but the question itself is sound.

2)What were the questions I did not know the answers to?

I never said you don't know the answers. I merely pointed out you were avoiding them. You still are.

3)S&D were used as a topical break. They were used as the intro and outro, to skits and commercials breaks.

And you are using them as red herrings.

While technically apart of the show their contribution was limited to pooping on the works of the rest of the cast who's personalities dominated the skits and various performances. Which again was my assessment of the series of rhetorical questions you asserted.

Technically part of the show?! You write as though the characters' routines were unscripted, like they were an actual double act that just wandered in and heckled everybody. Okay, I'll bite. I'm Statler (or Waldorf, whichever you prefer). You can be Gonzo, always trying to do something he can't and continually fucking up. Or maybe you're Fozzy, the perenially unfunny comic.

See? I can play too.

Oh and please learn the difference between "apart" and "a part". The two couldn't be more opposite if they were matter and antimatter.

Your still getting back what you put it.

And what precisely did I put "it"? I asked a couple of questions, developed a progression of enquiry, and tried being nice. Wasted effort, apparently, if all you're going to do is throw it back in my face. What is it with you theists lately?