Unanswered questions

[Drich]

I asked:

"what's the problem with allowing same-sex couples to marry, get their relationship recognised officially and then express whatever damn feelings they want

Show me where I said they can't. Then I can answer your question. Do you see now? I can not answer what you asked because I never took the position your 'question' put me in. I just assumed that you knew you're making crap up about what i believed as you go.

I don't care what gay people do in this or any soceity. My only problem is when people like gansta spock over try and dictate what is and is not 'Christian' doctrine.

I never said you don't know the answers. I merely pointed out you were avoiding them. You still are.

Because I am still under the assumption that you know your asking a baited question.

And you are using them as red herrings.

Because I will not acknoweledge you when you're guilty of begging the question? Come-on stimmy (Two m's right?) you know better than that.

Technically part of the show?!

As in did not follow the flow or format/theme of the rest of the show. the whole show was based on songs skits and muppet themed reenactments, of other shows and or movies. S&W was a departure from the rest of the show. A break or an abutment segmented or divided the show up into parts.

You write as though the characters' routines were unscripted, like they were an actual double act that just wandered in and heckled everybody. Okay, I'll bite. I'm Statler (or Waldorf, whichever you prefer). You can be Gonzo, always trying to do something he can't and continually fucking up. Or maybe you're Fozzy, the perenially unfunny comic.

See? I can play too.

Oh and please learn the difference between "apart" and "a part". The two couldn't be more opposite if they were matter and antimatter.

are you being ironic or oblivious? This is exactly what i am talking about.

And what precisely did I put "it"? I asked a couple of questions, developed a progression of enquiry, and tried being nice. Wasted effort, apparently, if all you're going to do is throw it back in my face. What is it with you theists lately?

a heckle and jeckle non sequiter observation, that puts the brakes on the rest of the show/discussion. In this case a retorical/question begging statement, that misrepersents my position on homosexual marriage.

You put the brakes on my discussion with a side stepping question So, why can't I do the same to you?

---

Eveyone that i read was either a context error or an intentional misinterpertation of the translation.

I am fairly certain you are the one who is misinterpreting with those rose colored glasses.

they may just be ignorant. Most people like that think or at least approach the bible as if it were orginally written in King James english. and not Konie Greek or Hebrew. As such they make no allowances for cultural differences or translative difficulties.

---

Excellent, Stim. Beat me to the punch.

See you two belong in a balcony seat together, where you can make critical comments about everything. that way you can still be apart of the 'show' and not actually have to contribute anything of substance.