RE: No verifiable evidence is the Christian position
August 18, 2013 at 1:47 am
(This post was last modified: August 18, 2013 at 2:09 am by FallentoReason.)
(August 17, 2013 at 4:33 am)fr0d0 Wrote: FTR
The only way I contradict myself is if you have a problem with comprehension. I've repeated again and again, and it says in the thread title my position.
It's ridiculous how I don't even have to say anything to defend my claim about your contradictions. You've done all the work yourself:
fr0d0 Wrote:FtR Wrote:" So, when you say that there *could* be a
supernatural explanation "
I didn't say that. I said there could be a natural explanation,
Earlier before
fr0d0 Wrote:I never said that water to wine doesn't have a supernatural explanation. I said it #could# have.
With all due respect, I'm going to have to withdraw from our discussion. Intellectual dishonesty is something I absolutely can't stand.
fr0d0, I have one last question. If you could, please respond to this statement with a simple "true" or "false":
God won't act in a given situation if it means being discovered.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
