(August 22, 2013 at 1:21 pm)David Sims Wrote:I don't think you can approach either zero or infinity in the way that you are talking about. However, you make a good point-- at the very least, DEFINING time in finite terms begs the question. "Time is finite, therefore. . . omg it appears that time is finite!"(March 18, 2013 at 6:07 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: 2. S1 has infinite no. of elementsWhy can't the contrary be made true by abandoning the insistence on one-second intervals and then allowing the ticks to come at an arbitrarily high rate? In that case the number of elements can be made to approach infinity as the interval between ticks approaches zero.
False, as it contradicts with the definition of Set 1; it has only Statuses separated by a finite number of seconds so it must have a finite No. of elements.
