(August 26, 2013 at 4:10 pm)Godschild Wrote: What do you think that would entail? Can we afford to allow those chemical weapons to find their way into terrorist hands.
Of course. Saddam Hussein had Chemical weapons for years. The Iranians have them, North Korea is Nuclear. The Soviet Union had enough Nukes to destory the entire world. If we invade Syria or whatever random country happens to be the enemy of the moment we'll kill many multiples the number of people that terrorists could possibly kill with some Chemical weapons plot, which would undoubtedly fail anyway. The most fatalities from a Chemical terrorist attack in the history of earth has been 8 (subway attacks in Japan.) Today it's harder than ever to pull off a mass terrorist attack and particularly difficult with Chemical weapons.
Less propaganda, more thinking please.