RE: Pleasure and Joy
August 27, 2013 at 4:31 pm
(This post was last modified: August 27, 2013 at 4:59 pm by Harris.)
(August 27, 2013 at 10:31 am)genkaus Wrote: Your opinion IS blind faith. And you can't see that.
Well! Its your opinion. I respect that.
(August 27, 2013 at 10:31 am)genkaus Wrote: It as already been done. To death.
http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Contradictions...e_Qur%27an
http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Scientific_Err...e_Qur%27an
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/..._name.html
Your opinions are blind faith because you refuse to see this.
Good Job.
I like your style of refutation. At least you are giving supporting material with your arguments.
I know all these and other similar allegations by heart. For you these allegations maybe a rocket science but for me these are no more than a schoolboy’s joke. Pick couple of most prominent contradictions and give me so I will refute them right here in this forum.
You say I have a blind faith but you are demonstrating it is in fact you who have blind faith in such allegations as you don’t even bother to verify whether those allegations are correct or not.
Let me inform you it is Dr. William Campbell (a doctor and Christian missionary) who originated most of those allegations. He lived and worked in Morocco and Tunisia for long time and knows fluent Arabic.
I recommend you to have a look on the work of Jochen Katz as well
http://www.answering-islam.org
You may find some good evidences against Quran from there as well.
Anyway, I am waiting to see few of your most favourite allegations
Simply, remember if someday someone finds some really authentic contradiction or discrepancy in Quran CNN and BBC would be the first to give a shout on that. It would be the biggest news in the world.
Quote:That's probably because you didn't understand what they were talking about.
Well! When I wrote:
“…science has not come to the stage where it can define self-consciousness.”
You wrote
“You are wrong. It has.”
Means we are talking about Hard Verifiable Evidences.
After I checked the article, I did not find any scientific evidence on the discovery of consciousness.
First part of the article mostly talked about how brain is functioning. In the second part, especially in HARD PROBLEM the author is giving clear signals that there are no scientific proofs on the discovery of Consciousness and indeed, there are no hard evidences in the article that can be verified by other scientists. The article is speculative in nature.