(September 5, 2013 at 3:36 am)Consilius Wrote: Well, this is interesting.
To wish your belief system was conventional would imply that you want it to be just like all other belief systems. Which is what I've been trying to tell you it already is.
No, to wish my belief system was conventional means I want it to be generally accepted. It isn't.
(September 5, 2013 at 3:36 am)Consilius Wrote: Also, is there some sort of higher standard you hold Christians to? Honest question, considering the quotes around "Christian".
That was a dig at Christian preponderance for using the no true Scotsman fallacy.
(September 5, 2013 at 3:36 am)Consilius Wrote: And you are condemning my use of ad hominems with ad hominems of your own. Very effective.
No, I'm condemning your use of ad hominems by pointing them out - which, in a rational debate, is sufficient and effective basis to reject your argument. My own name calling is not used as an argument and therefore does not amount to ad hominem and is done purely for my own fun - you mangy cur.
(September 5, 2013 at 3:36 am)Consilius Wrote: And this is the same person who just can't get over the fact that he has made some sort of landslide victory, and then appeals to the Internet for moral support.
Why would I 'get over' my landslide victory? Ofcourse I would celebrate it and want everyone to know about it.
(September 5, 2013 at 3:36 am)Consilius Wrote: I suppose this is a point for team atheism. And of course, the scorekeeper is the atheist I was arguing with.
It is. And yes, I will keep the score. Expect me to bring up this thread if you make the same nonsensical arguments you've made here.