RE: Unanswered questions
September 9, 2013 at 12:01 am
(This post was last modified: September 9, 2013 at 12:08 am by Drich.)
You guys still don't get it. The mutation in this case make the plant less effencient. In essence the plants are in a sense devolving as they 'evolve' so as to modify themselves to fit the environments they now live in. If a plant could orginaly process 100w aday and now in a more modern form can only process 75w aday then the 'mutation' speaks against evolution especially since we are told by the same science the planet is getting warmer.
My question from the beginning that can not be explained by mutation is if the daily amount of solar input of a given species is 75w at full contact, then how is it possible that some of the oldest species of plant life can successfully process so much more solar energy when made available?
My question from the beginning that can not be explained by mutation is if the daily amount of solar input of a given species is 75w at full contact, then how is it possible that some of the oldest species of plant life can successfully process so much more solar energy when made available?
