Unanswered questions

[Drich]

Of course there's a succession of mutations, because all changes and variations that occur within an organism are mutations. If life didn't mutate, we'd just be cloning ourselves.
.

tonus seems to think differently. maybe you two figure out who is right, and present one. Otherwise people might start to think I have divided the oppsitions argument.

False dichotomy, and I find it amazing that, after earlier today telling you again that evolutionary changes aren't dependent on the environment, I have to do it a second time. Are you even reading my posts? Are you reading anything that has been written in this thread?

Let me tell you again: these plants are NOT adapting themselves to ANY kind of environmental stimuli, because evolution does not, can not, and never has been proposed to, respond to environmental issues. Do you understand, now?

Now it's my turn to ask have you been reading ANY of my threads?!?!

Because I have said over and over and over My argument states that the ablity to absorb more energy than the sun puts out is not a mutation!!! It is or rather it was the starting point of all plant life that existed at the time of creation!!!! That they were originally created to absorb this 'pure' or at least purer from of light that existed before the sun. That Plants since then have De-evolved and mutated to MAXIMIZE their ablity to process the current suns energy in varing degrees.

Your still arguing in the other direction. which means you still do not grasp the nature of the argument. which makes all of your points and analogies invalid for what is being discussed.