RE: Ontology of God--Theological Noncognitivist View
January 16, 2010 at 12:19 am
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2010 at 1:07 am by KichigaiNeko.)
(January 15, 2010 at 11:06 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: I think you misunderstood Kich.
A child learns by trial and error in the absence of guidance, influence and instinct. Trial and error is the worst method. The abrahamic definitions of God were arrived at by figuring out what God was not.
Ignosticism suggests that we can't know what God isn't, which is clearly falsifiable. You aren't God. FAIL.
That's nice dear...
And you are right in as much as a child will learn by figuring out what will and will not work. Not the fundemental components of what it is and why. You are talking about concepts which is no different than the concept of string theory (IMHO)
I am not god?? (FFS don't tell my kids!) Why should that be an argument??? And further, if that is your definition as per your previous posts, then I can not exist...so why are you arguing??
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
