Further the person trying to explain it to you via the colour blue is a fellow Theological Noncognitivist. How amusing is that! 
You commit yet another fallacy by calling into question my intelligence. Strike 3!
The unicorn having no meaning is the crux of the problem. The formulation of the God concept does have meaning, and his transcendental nature is core to his essence. Believing in him has a lot of meaning. Meaning which is emphasised by the necessity for faith in his existence.
You commit yet another fallacy by calling into question my intelligence. Strike 3!
The unicorn having no meaning is the crux of the problem. The formulation of the God concept does have meaning, and his transcendental nature is core to his essence. Believing in him has a lot of meaning. Meaning which is emphasised by the necessity for faith in his existence.
