Pleasure and Joy

[paulpablo]

First, you have not given any historical reference for Babylonians and Chinese, which show they were using fingerprints. Second, if I agree for the sake of argument that Babylonians and Chinese where using fingerprints, then for the discovery of fingerprints why all credit goes to Frances Gold why not to Babylonians and Chinese.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fingerprint#History

Fingerprints were used as signatures in ancient Babylon in the second millennium BCE.[44] In order to protect against forgery, parties to a legal contract would impress their fingerprints into a clay tablet on which the contract had been written. By 246 BCE, Chinese officials were impressing their fingerprints into the clay seals used to seal documents. With the advent of silk and paper in China, parties to a legal contract impressed their handprints on the document. Sometime before 851 CE, an Arab merchant in China, Abu Zayd Hasan, witnessed Chinese merchants using fingerprints to authenticate loans.[45] By 702, Japan allowed illiterate petitioners seeking a divorce to "sign" their petitions with a fingerprint.[46]

http://onin.com/fp/fphistory.html

Chinese records from the 221-206 BC Qin Dynasty include details about using handprints as evidence during burglary investigations.

http://www.aladdinusa.com/documentations...istory.htm

Pre-historic picture writing of a hand with ridge patterns was discovered in Nova Scotia. In ancient Babylon, fingerprints were used on clay tablets for business transactions. In ancient China, thumb prints were found on clay seals.

Show me the information you have about frances gold, if that is how you spell his name, then we can talk about why he has been given credit for anything.

---

Hint means a slight or indirect indication. Hint always contains slight part of a universal fact in an indicative form only. Here part is fingerprints (hidden part) and whole is fingertips. It is a universal truth that fingertips have fingerprints with which no one can contradict.

I know fingertips have fingerprints so what?

You believe gods final message to you was via the quran, therefore if he gives you a piece of information in the quran which is only a hint, then all you can do is guess about what the hint is telling you.

It is actually impossible for you to not be guessing what god is hinting to you since he hasn't come down and told you if you are correct or not has he?

You are guessing but just won't admit it.

---

Yes, it is obvious that when people are burned the skin is damaged, roasted. However, before people did not know that skin has pain receptors and it is responsible for pain. I wrote above that whenever Quran speaks specifically about something there is some hint behind it. God stated that he would change the roasted skins with the fresh ones so the pain of burning will continue. If there won’t be skins there won’t be pain and punishment. There is a special mention of changing of skins, which is related to continuation of punishment, and this is the clue that skins are special.

The quran doesn't mention pain receptors, the quran just says people will get their skins roasted then have them replaced by more skins so they get roasted again.

People knew if they were going to get their skins roasted, then replaced by another skin and roasted again it would cause them a lot of pain.

---

Most interestingly there are no links between these four humanlike species. It is an absurd to derive roots of present day humans out from the fossils.

Secondly, according to molecular biology theory (the genetic coding), visualization of single ape DNA evolving into Human DNA is almost infinitesimally improbable.

What do you mean no links between the 4 humans?

We are classified as apes.

other apes who are humans are unlikely to evolve into humans because it is correct that 2 different species evolving into exactly the same species independantly is very very unlikely to happen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ape#Greater_and_lesser