(September 26, 2013 at 5:18 pm)Gilgamesh Wrote:Sorry, I wasn't being very clear. That wasn't how I meant it. Thunderf00t took issue with the whole "teach boys not to rape" thing. I was saying why that particular idea came about. Girls are constantly warned about rape and given advice on how to avoid it for a pretty good reason, sure. But the issue is boys aren't lectured on why it's wrong to rape girls. Why? They could do it all at the same time. In the same room. A general talk about rape, why not to do it, and how to protect yourself if necessary. It's not equal the way it is.(September 26, 2013 at 4:26 pm)NoraBrimstone Wrote: Also, in my school, the girls were taken out of class occasionally to be warned about rape and how to behave and dress to avoid it, we even had kick boxing lessons.So? I don't want to strawman you, but if you are inferring that teaching women how to avoid rape scenarios - or how to get out of one, is the same as blaming them for the rape, then you're wrong.
(September 26, 2013 at 5:18 pm)Gilgamesh Wrote:First of all, Fuck you, you absolute piece of shit. That's exactly the fucking problem here.Quote:Even when a girl at my school was raped in the toilets, the girls were again taken out of classes to be told not to flirt with boys during break time. Again, the boys were never given a talk on not raping.Maybe she wasn't raped. Getting caught having sex in the school bathroom would never prompt the female who took part to claim rape. I'm assuming you didn't actually see what happened in that bathroom, though. Did you see it? If not, calling the guy a rapist is pretty crude.
Yes she was fucking raped. He beat the shit out of her and broke her leg. He went to prison for it. But hey, maybe she liked it rough, and was embarrassed about that, eh? Did you see what happened? If not, calling the victim of a violent crime a liar is pretty fucking crude.
Cunt...
