(September 27, 2013 at 1:44 pm)Monolens Wrote: These texts are taken from the Russian book with compilation of old Russian folks.
You can read the original here
This is not something I know. These are allegories which recorded by scientists from the original keepers - old people over Eurasia.
Don't read Russian. Sorry.
Anyway, you still haven't shown that these are allegories about moon.
(September 27, 2013 at 1:44 pm)Monolens Wrote: According to texts those allegories are spoken to the sky. And they where pronounced in the night time.
What yoke can farmer see night time in the sky? What else in night sky can be recognised as the ship?
Do better research next time.
These hymns are addressed specifically to Ashvins - twin gods symbolizing sunrise and sunset.
You missed a much bigger and more obvious clue here - the repeated use of "two". And most of the allegories here are things that come in pairs. That the prayer was addressed to the skies means nothing - since that's where all the gods supposedly reside.
(September 27, 2013 at 1:44 pm)Monolens Wrote: I understand your antagonism, but it should not close your eyes against the logic.
And again I point your attention that I came to discribed semantic core not by reading antient books. I did the computer analysis of our language and received it. After I was surprised that same core appears in mostly all ancient texts.
No antagonism here. I just see you reaching for conclusions. I can get behind the idea that there are semantic similarities between ancient texts of different groups. I can even accept that some of their core ideas may appear to be similar and that there would be quite a few recurring elements. All that is to be expected. But reducing it to the simplistic conclusion that "All ancients thought moon was god and anything crescent-shaped was divine" is, frankly, a big leap not supported by logic.
(September 27, 2013 at 1:44 pm)Monolens Wrote: Please look at the following picture and solve the logic puzzle. Which shapes are more close to each other? Above or below?
All the objects from text have little resemblance with each other on same basis. Its boat-like shape. And all these object an author of texts could see in the night sky. Can you give your opinion of what he was seeing there?
The one below. The steeper U-shape of the bottle resembles the wishbone more closely than the boat.
Of the objects given in the text, greater resemblance come from them existing as pairs than from the imaginary "boat-shape". And what he was seeing in the sky was the paired events of sunrise and sunset.
(September 27, 2013 at 1:44 pm)Monolens Wrote: And the above stated means that Moses is the allegory of the Moon. If you remember Moses came to his kingmother in a small boat. The boat is another moon allegory as already mentioned.
Also you can compare the name MoSeS with Russian name of crescent moon - MeSyaC. It is completely phonetically same.
So many coincidences can't be just coincidences.
This is precisely why I compared your theory to a conspiracy theory. It is not even a significant incident - much less a coincidence. The moon-landing conspiracy theory has stronger evidence than this.
Just because you claim boat is an allegory to moon doesn't make it so.
There is very little phonetic similarity between Moss and Mesyac.
Further, the "horn" misinterpretation is easily explained by the same word meaning two different things in the same language - a common occurrence in any language.
(September 27, 2013 at 1:44 pm)Monolens Wrote: In the Bible god says to Moses to produce crescent shaped stuff and put it on the head of priest, to remember the god everytime he wears this stuff. Isn't it enouph to understand that god wants people to remember its shape?
I've seen no reference to this crescent shaped staff. So, no, this statement means nothing.
(September 27, 2013 at 1:44 pm)Monolens Wrote: I can give you another good example from the Bible.
When Noah sees the reinbow in the sky the god speaks to him with covenant that everytime when Noah or his tribe will see the rainbow they will remind the god.
Do I need to tell that the shape of rainbow is same as the shape of crecsent?
Sorry, but a rainbow is not a crescent. Your argument would've meant something if god had spoken to Noah when he saw the crescent moon - but doing so with a rainbow signifies nothing.
(September 27, 2013 at 1:44 pm)Monolens Wrote: I can try to summarize my essay with example of language reasoning. You will be able to solve the puzzle yourself and come to predicted results.
Please give as more words as you know which have structure same to given before word "karan". Vowels can be any and consonants must follow the initial structure. For example: CRaNe, CRowN, GReeN and so on. You can give the word from any language used by human.
I predict that all words that you will give will have in its etymology or meaning the above mentioned shapes: angle, horn, beam.
And they will come to previously mentioned semantic core: cow, fish, god, HoRN, boat.
The main distinction of successful scientific theory is the predicting power. You can check yourself that given theory has ultimate predicting power.
Your own examples of Crane and green fail your test.
Other examples include crone, caravan, Karn (sanskrit) and Karin (Japanese).