(October 3, 2013 at 6:51 am)Kayenneh Wrote:(October 3, 2013 at 6:45 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Well, to be honest, they probably constitute the crushing majority of the "homeless" pop in eastern Europe.
And giving them homes is practically dooming those homes to be used as stables for their horses and mules.
They generally use them for a while and then discard them. I think its best to accept gypsies as they are, they cannot be changed unless they are forced to do so.
This is a matter I have to stay out of as much as possible, since I'm really biased. The Finnish gypsies are unfortunately one of the biggest group to get government subsidies, while they try to avoid as far as possible to give anything back. Most of the organized crime around here involves this particular group. And I can't stand their chauvinistic and highly religious values. But, I still think it's not the proper way to ban a whole demographic, because still, there are decent gypsies that have done nothing to deserve such treatment. I can however agree that there will be no change as long as things continue this way.
Well, I myself know a couple of decent gypsies. True, they don't really value education or anything too much, but they are musicians and they make good music too-though as a people, gypsies generally don't hold any other allegiance than to their own.
The few that are decent already live in a ghetto or slum, not nomadic, yet those places too are those of crime and illiteracy, and gypsy women tend to marry very young, not many actually strive to get an education because they wouldn't know what to do with it.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?