RE: The vast complexity of living things proves that God exists (proof 1)
October 3, 2013 at 7:45 am
(October 3, 2013 at 6:36 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Sorting due to settlement of sediments.
That's not the way sediment works.
Quote:Also man would have initially moved to higher ground.
And then been cast down in the waters of the flood, no? I mean, they did drown.
Quote:The land was not yet divided. That happens later.
Pangea? Really? And what do you say to the demonstrable, peer reviewed scientific evidence on continental drift that shows you are, without a doubt, wrong?
Quote:God would have directed the animals back to the natural habitat.
How? Magic?
Quote:The world change after the flood. So some species would wide out, others survive.
Isn't it funny how you're that general, while in another thread, you demand exact calculations? Just "changed?" No reason, just changed in whatever way best suits your argument?
Quote:You are assuming that dating techniques are valid beyond the flood and its aftermath.
And you're assuming they aren't. The difference is, we have evidence, you have a dishonest presupposition.
Quote:Maybe the entire Sahara was just a wash in of sediment from the flood.
And maybe you're a sentient piece of cheese. Why are we just desperately positing fictional scenarios?
Quote:Seeds
And the non-seeding plants?
Quote:Not every animal kind on the Ark were by 2's.
Which just increases the impossibility of the ark as described holding the requisite number of animals.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!