(October 3, 2013 at 2:40 pm)JeffB Wrote: I mentioned challenges to the age of the universe. Some were curious. I provided links.
All I got in response were excuses not to read them: discrediting the source, or stopping at the weak argument considered weak.
In the case of ICR, we've gone through their bullshit ad nauseum. It's crappy, ad hoc nonsense and not worth spending any time on.
Your other source? All I see is bare assertions and arguments from ignorance.
You like links? Here's one for you.
http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs.html
It's a bit dated, but it provides solid counter arguments to about every creationist claim that existed at the time - and it illustrates a damn good reason why creationists don't get published in mainstream journals: their research is ad hoc and shoddy.