(October 3, 2013 at 10:34 pm)Zazzy Wrote:(October 3, 2013 at 9:40 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: My bad.Nothing interesting. Wow, what a waste of time.
What were we even talking about?
I figured that out about five pages ago.

Vinnie argues that subjectivity proves objectivity, argues ad populum, argues strawman, argues non-sequitur, and argues that science is inferior to philosophy, when the only meaningful thing philosophy has ever produced to society is a bunch of questions that are unanswerable and therefore not worth bothering to consider. Somehow he leaps to the conclusion that because I cannot prove my red is his red that therefore this is tantamount to the evidence of a deity in some weird half-baked cake of non-logic wherein he thinks that because the claim has been made and, ad populum, children grow up believing it [carefully forgetting to remember that they also believe in Santa Claus and BOTH subjects are taught by the parents, not inborn knowledge] and also lots of people believe it ergo it must be true.
Red herrings all over the place, a bunch of philosobabble, logical fallacies all but erupting from his ass like an exploding volcano of irrationality, and finally complete and total blissful ignorance that he continually shoots himself in the foot at every attempt he makes to "prove" he is correct.
Vinnie is an intellectual trainwreck. His avatar fits him perfectly.
Creed's recommendation: Don't waste your time.