RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 9, 2013 at 7:54 am
(October 9, 2013 at 7:38 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:(October 9, 2013 at 7:36 am)Captain Colostomy Wrote: So I guess redshift is simply the change your face makes as atheists refuse your proof, Gracie?
David Russell Humphreys already developed a model that accounts for the red shift.
But you miss the point.
The "no God" assumption has already been proven false.
Therefore the "no God" assumption can never be used in determining the age question.
You guys crack me up. Humphreys isn't a scientist, he's a sellout, an apologist whose ideas have bigger holes than the hoops he jumps to reach them.