The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: September 3, 2026, 3:35 pm

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

Crossless2.0 Offline

Senior Member

Religious Views: Atheist

Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation: 54

#191

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

October 9, 2013 at 7:57 am

(October 9, 2013 at 7:54 am)Captain Colostomy Wrote:
(October 9, 2013 at 7:38 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: David Russell Humphreys already developed a model that accounts for the red shift.

But you miss the point.

The "no God" assumption has already been proven false.

Therefore the "no God" assumption can never be used in determining the age question.

You guys crack me up. Humphreys isn't a scientist, he's a sellout, an apologist whose ideas have bigger holes than the hoops he jumps to reach them.

Oh, but the Humphreys model took the world of physics by storm and put the ICR firmly on the cutting edge of research.

Oh, wait . . .

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 5, 2013 at 4:04 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 5, 2013 at 4:23 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 5, 2013 at 4:24 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 5, 2013 at 4:26 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 5, 2013 at 9:04 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 5, 2013 at 10:22 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 6, 2013 at 3:05 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 3:49 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 6, 2013 at 6:21 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 6:29 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 6, 2013 at 7:02 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 7:21 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Simon Moon - October 5, 2013 at 4:28 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 5, 2013 at 4:31 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Airyaman - October 5, 2013 at 4:30 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Simon Moon - October 5, 2013 at 4:42 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Darwinian - October 5, 2013 at 5:50 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 5, 2013 at 5:53 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by KichigaiNeko - October 5, 2013 at 9:41 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 5, 2013 at 6:23 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 5, 2013 at 6:35 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 5, 2013 at 6:41 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 5, 2013 at 6:57 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 5, 2013 at 6:59 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 5, 2013 at 6:51 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 5, 2013 at 6:56 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Minimalist - October 5, 2013 at 9:21 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Airyaman - October 5, 2013 at 9:43 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Minimalist - October 5, 2013 at 9:48 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ryantology - October 6, 2013 at 2:23 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 6, 2013 at 4:01 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by KichigaiNeko - October 6, 2013 at 6:25 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 6, 2013 at 8:15 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 6, 2013 at 8:27 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 6, 2013 at 8:57 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 9:01 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 6, 2013 at 10:47 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 6, 2013 at 11:16 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 11:18 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 6, 2013 at 11:30 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 6, 2013 at 2:58 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 4:05 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 6, 2013 at 11:43 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 8:23 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Mothonis - October 6, 2013 at 8:27 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 6, 2013 at 8:35 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tonus - October 6, 2013 at 8:48 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Anomalocaris - October 6, 2013 at 4:20 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 6, 2013 at 4:22 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Anomalocaris - October 6, 2013 at 4:27 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 6, 2013 at 4:29 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Anomalocaris - October 6, 2013 at 4:34 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 6, 2013 at 5:17 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Heir Apparent - October 6, 2013 at 6:24 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 7, 2013 at 1:49 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 7, 2013 at 2:14 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 7, 2013 at 2:35 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 7, 2013 at 3:18 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Lemonvariable72 - October 7, 2013 at 5:41 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 7, 2013 at 2:17 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Cyberman - October 7, 2013 at 2:20 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 7, 2013 at 2:22 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tonus - October 7, 2013 at 3:27 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Cyberman - October 7, 2013 at 2:46 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 7, 2013 at 6:56 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by ThomM - October 7, 2013 at 7:48 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 7, 2013 at 8:15 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ryantology - October 7, 2013 at 8:18 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 12:19 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 6:43 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 6:59 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 7:05 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 7:15 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ben Davis - October 8, 2013 at 7:25 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 7:32 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ben Davis - October 8, 2013 at 7:35 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Chas - October 8, 2013 at 9:56 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 7, 2013 at 8:31 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Cinjin - October 7, 2013 at 9:01 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 7, 2013 at 9:36 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 7, 2013 at 11:01 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 7, 2013 at 9:28 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Lemonvariable72 - October 7, 2013 at 10:45 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 7, 2013 at 11:01 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 7, 2013 at 11:25 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 7, 2013 at 11:31 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 7, 2013 at 11:45 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tonus - October 8, 2013 at 7:29 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 7:33 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tonus - October 8, 2013 at 7:39 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 7:44 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Cinjin - October 8, 2013 at 12:15 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 6:52 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ben Davis - October 8, 2013 at 6:59 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by LastPoet - October 8, 2013 at 7:10 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 7:10 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 7:10 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 7:17 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 7:22 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 7:31 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 7:36 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 8, 2013 at 1:05 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 1:41 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 1:50 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Fidel_Castronaut - October 8, 2013 at 2:01 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 1:59 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 2:22 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 2:40 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 8, 2013 at 2:58 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 3:16 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 8, 2013 at 3:33 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Anomalocaris - October 8, 2013 at 3:47 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 8, 2013 at 3:50 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 7:32 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 7:33 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 7:37 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 7:28 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by LastPoet - October 8, 2013 at 7:17 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 7:21 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 8, 2013 at 7:18 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 7:39 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by LastPoet - October 8, 2013 at 7:45 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 8, 2013 at 7:48 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 7:52 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 7:54 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 7:54 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 8, 2013 at 7:58 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 7:59 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 8:09 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 8, 2013 at 8:12 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 8:18 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 8:21 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Lemonvariable72 - October 8, 2013 at 8:25 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 8, 2013 at 8:28 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 8:38 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 8:41 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 8:43 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 8:44 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 8:47 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ben Davis - October 8, 2013 at 9:33 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 9:36 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 8, 2013 at 9:18 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 8, 2013 at 12:01 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 10:10 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 11:49 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 12:09 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 8, 2013 at 12:00 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 8, 2013 at 8:21 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 8, 2013 at 8:41 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 8, 2013 at 9:02 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 8, 2013 at 9:06 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 9:08 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 8, 2013 at 9:11 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Anomalocaris - October 8, 2013 at 1:42 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Lemonvariable72 - October 8, 2013 at 9:26 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 12:38 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 8, 2013 at 1:04 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Fidel_Castronaut - October 8, 2013 at 1:07 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 8, 2013 at 1:11 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Fidel_Castronaut - October 8, 2013 at 1:48 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 8, 2013 at 1:18 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 1:38 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Psykhronic - October 8, 2013 at 2:02 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 2:12 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tiberius - October 8, 2013 at 2:28 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 2:32 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ryantology - October 8, 2013 at 2:36 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 8, 2013 at 2:48 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Cyberman - October 8, 2013 at 2:53 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ryantology - October 8, 2013 at 8:52 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 8, 2013 at 9:38 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 9, 2013 at 1:27 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tiberius - October 8, 2013 at 2:54 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 3:08 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Anomalocaris - October 8, 2013 at 3:21 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tiberius - October 8, 2013 at 3:25 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Cyberman - October 8, 2013 at 3:30 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 9, 2013 at 5:09 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 6:41 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 9, 2013 at 6:48 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 7:16 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 9, 2013 at 8:09 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 8:11 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 9, 2013 at 8:53 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 10:00 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 9, 2013 at 10:53 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 9, 2013 at 9:48 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 9, 2013 at 7:30 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 7:34 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 9, 2013 at 7:59 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 9, 2013 at 7:36 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 7:38 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Chas - October 9, 2013 at 7:51 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 9, 2013 at 7:54 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 9, 2013 at 7:57 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 9, 2013 at 7:55 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 9, 2013 at 8:19 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Psykhronic - October 9, 2013 at 10:02 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 10:04 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Psykhronic - October 9, 2013 at 10:11 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Fidel_Castronaut - October 9, 2013 at 11:34 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 9, 2013 at 11:28 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 9, 2013 at 11:45 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 9, 2013 at 11:47 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 9, 2013 at 11:57 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 10, 2013 at 9:16 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 10, 2013 at 10:26 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 10, 2013 at 10:28 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Chas - October 10, 2013 at 10:43 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 10, 2013 at 10:47 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 10, 2013 at 2:00 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 12, 2013 at 6:31 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 14, 2013 at 6:05 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 9, 2013 at 11:54 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 10, 2013 at 1:23 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Good Christians only may answer...	Gawdzilla Sama	58	22186	September 18, 2018 at 3:22 pm Last Post: Bob Kelso
	While Judaism may have had forced marriage war booties, i think it reasons is for it	Rakie	17	7384	August 2, 2017 at 2:17 pm Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
	Lol the bible is actually ok with pedophilia, proof from passage	Rarieo	80	39803	July 29, 2017 at 12:50 am Last Post: Astonished
	Christianity actually condones murder	Rolandson	50	20211	January 21, 2017 at 10:09 pm Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
	Truth in a story which is entirely dependent upon subjective interpretation	Astonished	47	14381	January 10, 2017 at 8:57 am Last Post: Edwardo Piet
	Catholicism would actually be the most likely controlled Christianity	Rolandson	10	3939	January 1, 2017 at 11:44 am Last Post: Redoubtable
	What do non-fundamentalist Christians actually believe?	Fromper	66	37195	June 30, 2016 at 7:08 pm Last Post: vorlon13
	You Can't Disprove a Miracle	Rhondazvous	155	38810	March 18, 2016 at 11:05 am Last Post: Cyberman
	Hi, I'm a Christian. Help Me Disprove My Religion!	WishfulThinking	265	105418	October 11, 2015 at 9:20 am Last Post: Cyberman
	Dear Christians: What does your god actually do?	Aractus	144	78251	October 9, 2015 at 6:38 am Last Post: robvalue

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me