Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 16, 2025, 1:41 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom
#7
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom
Perhaps some of you idiots should try explaining if you really do know the reason that two negatives multiplied together give a positive.

I'll give you my take on it - mathematics is invented by humans, and is based on rules, which are also invented. Numbers are not real, and while positive numbers can be likened to reality, somewhat, negative numbers of course cannot. For instance you can 0 Apples, you can 12 Apples, but you can not have -1 Apples. The reason we have negative numbers is that that we can perform negative operations on positive numbers, for instance if you have 12 Apples and negative 9 Apples you now have 3 Apples. Note that you cannot physically have 12 Apples and negative 13 Apples, however you can do this in mathematics. Each integer and each rational number has a negative inverse, which when added together equals zero. For instance 5 + (-5) = 0.

Anyway, the rules are this:

1 * -1 = -1

Now divide each side by -1 (you can just remove it from the left side):

1 = -1/-1

So two negatives divided by each other equal a positive, and the same must be true for multiplication because you can rewrite it like this:

1 = (1/-1) * (-1/1)
1 = -(1/1) * -(1/1)
1 = -1 * -1

That's one reason, and the only other reason I can think of, and it may be the more correct reason, is that -1*-1 = +1 is the only way to solve the equation without causing other mathematical problems and issues with negative numbers. For instance, if -1 * -1 = -1 and +1 * +1 = +1, then how do you transform a negative number into a positive? You can't, but you can transform a positive number into a negative like this: +1 * -1 = -1, so it would have no inverse there would be no way in which to undo it. Another rule that would break is this one - any number "k" divided by itself equals 1 ie k/k = 1, well if -1 * -1 = -1 then for k= -1: -1 / -1 = -1, rule broken!
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK

The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK


"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Reply



Messages In This Thread
why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by snowtracks - October 12, 2013 at 12:01 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Cato - October 12, 2013 at 12:48 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Captain Colostomy - October 12, 2013 at 1:46 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Minimalist - October 12, 2013 at 1:55 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by snowtracks - October 12, 2013 at 2:13 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Faith No More - October 12, 2013 at 2:16 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by snowtracks - October 12, 2013 at 3:00 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 12, 2013 at 2:51 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Faith No More - October 12, 2013 at 4:06 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 12, 2013 at 5:41 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Faith No More - October 12, 2013 at 8:43 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Bucky Ball - October 12, 2013 at 4:33 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 12, 2013 at 5:07 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 12, 2013 at 3:33 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 8:13 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 8:26 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 8:50 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 9:36 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 10:33 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 3:45 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 5:43 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 7:15 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 7:28 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 15, 2013 at 1:26 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Norfolk And Chance - October 28, 2013 at 3:47 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Anomalocaris - October 12, 2013 at 9:10 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Brakeman - October 12, 2013 at 9:47 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 10:07 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by snowtracks - October 12, 2013 at 12:20 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by LastPoet - October 12, 2013 at 12:21 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by bennyboy - October 13, 2013 at 3:26 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 13, 2013 at 10:27 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by bennyboy - October 13, 2013 at 3:31 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 16, 2013 at 7:37 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Brakeman - October 16, 2013 at 12:31 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 16, 2013 at 1:57 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by daandaan - October 13, 2013 at 3:48 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by John V - October 15, 2013 at 3:34 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by DLJ - October 16, 2013 at 12:44 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 16, 2013 at 1:13 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by DLJ - October 16, 2013 at 1:15 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 16, 2013 at 1:17 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by DLJ - October 16, 2013 at 1:18 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 16, 2013 at 1:25 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 16, 2013 at 1:51 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by DLJ - October 16, 2013 at 1:55 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Anomalocaris - October 19, 2013 at 1:15 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 17, 2013 at 5:48 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 17, 2013 at 2:16 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 18, 2013 at 3:38 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 18, 2013 at 4:14 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 18, 2013 at 5:15 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 18, 2013 at 5:17 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 20, 2013 at 12:41 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 18, 2013 at 3:48 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 18, 2013 at 5:45 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Polaris - October 20, 2013 at 12:53 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 22, 2013 at 2:15 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Polaris - October 24, 2013 at 9:35 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Neo-Scholastic - October 28, 2013 at 4:13 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Neo-Scholastic - October 28, 2013 at 5:35 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)