Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 29, 2025, 8:23 pm
Atheist Forums › Science › Mathematics v
why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom
Bucky Ball Offline
badass messiah
***
Religious Views: Igtheist .. there is no coherent definition of the word "god"
Posts: 2278
Threads: 9
Joined: October 3, 2013
Reputation: 25
#11
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom
October 12, 2013 at 4:33 am
(October 12, 2013 at 2:51 am)Aractus Wrote: I'll give you my take on it - mathematics is invented by humans, and is based on rules, which are also invented.

If they're "invented" then they *just happen* to correspond, and predict, and describe perfectly everything that is found to be true in Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Probability ? Right.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQYeV4jjKPk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEiSloE1r-A
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › Mathematics v
why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom

Messages In This Thread
why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by snowtracks - October 12, 2013 at 12:01 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Cato - October 12, 2013 at 12:48 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Captain Colostomy - October 12, 2013 at 1:46 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Minimalist - October 12, 2013 at 1:55 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by snowtracks - October 12, 2013 at 2:13 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Faith No More - October 12, 2013 at 2:16 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by snowtracks - October 12, 2013 at 3:00 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 12, 2013 at 2:51 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Faith No More - October 12, 2013 at 4:06 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 12, 2013 at 5:41 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Faith No More - October 12, 2013 at 8:43 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Bucky Ball - October 12, 2013 at 4:33 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 12, 2013 at 5:07 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 12, 2013 at 3:33 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 8:13 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 8:26 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 8:50 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 9:36 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 10:33 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 3:45 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 5:43 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 7:15 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 7:28 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 15, 2013 at 1:26 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Norfolk And Chance - October 28, 2013 at 3:47 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Anomalocaris - October 12, 2013 at 9:10 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Brakeman - October 12, 2013 at 9:47 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 10:07 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by snowtracks - October 12, 2013 at 12:20 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by LastPoet - October 12, 2013 at 12:21 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by bennyboy - October 13, 2013 at 3:26 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 13, 2013 at 10:27 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by bennyboy - October 13, 2013 at 3:31 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 16, 2013 at 7:37 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Brakeman - October 16, 2013 at 12:31 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 16, 2013 at 1:57 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by daandaan - October 13, 2013 at 3:48 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by John V - October 15, 2013 at 3:34 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by DLJ - October 16, 2013 at 12:44 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 16, 2013 at 1:13 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by DLJ - October 16, 2013 at 1:15 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 16, 2013 at 1:17 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by DLJ - October 16, 2013 at 1:18 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 16, 2013 at 1:25 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 16, 2013 at 1:51 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by DLJ - October 16, 2013 at 1:55 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Anomalocaris - October 19, 2013 at 1:15 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 17, 2013 at 5:48 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 17, 2013 at 2:16 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 18, 2013 at 3:38 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 18, 2013 at 4:14 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 18, 2013 at 5:15 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 18, 2013 at 5:17 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 20, 2013 at 12:41 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 18, 2013 at 3:48 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 18, 2013 at 5:45 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Polaris - October 20, 2013 at 12:53 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 22, 2013 at 2:15 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Polaris - October 24, 2013 at 9:35 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Neo-Scholastic - October 28, 2013 at 4:13 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Neo-Scholastic - October 28, 2013 at 5:35 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)