RE: Are you joking?
October 12, 2013 at 8:45 am
(This post was last modified: October 12, 2013 at 8:50 am by Little Rik.)
(October 12, 2013 at 8:02 am)The Germans are coming Wrote: Science has the goal of figuring out why and how things work. And not wether god exists or not.
Your limitations are very evident.
Again you are convinced that there is only your science or physical science and therefore you have build a wall around it creating a DOGMA and do not allow anything else to penetrate your small world.
Quote:There is no proof of anything "non physical" to exist.
Eh, you reincarnate from that crowd that were ridicule the guy who invented the fridge when he was saying that the heat could create cold?
Quote:Which is where everything ends. Because when rambling about "non physical" nonsence, you build your entire verbal construction on something of which there is no proof that it even exists. Hence your essential not saying anything let alone making a point.
There was a time that people thought that the smaller parts were what you can see with your eyes.
It took long time to invent the lenses and it took even more time to realize that atoms are not the smaller parts and now it will take even more time to understand where everything come from.
But not for those who work on self awareness.
(October 12, 2013 at 8:33 am)Zazzy Wrote: It doesn't seem difficult to understand that god concepts are supernatural, which by definition puts them above and outside of the physical and natural. Science can only study things that abide by the known rules of the physical. Therefore science cannot possibly investigate anything truly supernatural. If we discovered a god who DID abide by natural laws, which we could then study, then it wouldn't be a god, because it would be bound by natural law and would not be supernatural. A god subject to gravity or entropy would be a disappointing god.
Are you saying that God once incarnate could not do whatever he-she like?
How would you know?
