Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 4, 2024, 10:07 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom
#28
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom
(October 12, 2013 at 7:15 pm)Tiberius Wrote:
(October 12, 2013 at 5:43 pm)Chas Wrote: The OP didn't express a problem with anything but the multiplication of two negative numbers resulting in a positive number.

Your comments have nothing to do with either his question or my answer.
I'm not entirely sure you're reading my posts correctly. My posts have dealt with the proof that multiplying two negative numbers always results in a positive number, which is the answer to the example the OP gave.

Your posts on the other hand involved multiplying by -1 a lot, without any explanation of what was going on. In addition, you multiplied two negative numbers (producing a positive number) in order to prove that two negative numbers produced a positive number. That kind of proof doesn't work in mathematics.

It would be like saying that all square roots are even, and then showing that the square root of 4 is 2 as proof.

Well, you caught me there.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by snowtracks - October 12, 2013 at 12:01 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Cato - October 12, 2013 at 12:48 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Captain Colostomy - October 12, 2013 at 1:46 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Minimalist - October 12, 2013 at 1:55 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by snowtracks - October 12, 2013 at 2:13 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Faith No More - October 12, 2013 at 2:16 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by snowtracks - October 12, 2013 at 3:00 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 12, 2013 at 2:51 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Faith No More - October 12, 2013 at 4:06 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 12, 2013 at 5:41 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Faith No More - October 12, 2013 at 8:43 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Bucky Ball - October 12, 2013 at 4:33 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 12, 2013 at 5:07 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 12, 2013 at 3:33 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 8:13 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 8:26 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 8:50 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 9:36 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 10:33 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 3:45 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 5:43 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 7:15 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 12, 2013 at 7:28 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 15, 2013 at 1:26 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Norfolk And Chance - October 28, 2013 at 3:47 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Anomalocaris - October 12, 2013 at 9:10 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Brakeman - October 12, 2013 at 9:47 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 12, 2013 at 10:07 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by snowtracks - October 12, 2013 at 12:20 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by LastPoet - October 12, 2013 at 12:21 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by bennyboy - October 13, 2013 at 3:26 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 13, 2013 at 10:27 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by bennyboy - October 13, 2013 at 3:31 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 16, 2013 at 7:37 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Brakeman - October 16, 2013 at 12:31 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 16, 2013 at 1:57 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by daandaan - October 13, 2013 at 3:48 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by John V - October 15, 2013 at 3:34 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by DLJ - October 16, 2013 at 12:44 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 16, 2013 at 1:13 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by DLJ - October 16, 2013 at 1:15 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 16, 2013 at 1:17 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by DLJ - October 16, 2013 at 1:18 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 16, 2013 at 1:25 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Chas - October 16, 2013 at 1:51 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by DLJ - October 16, 2013 at 1:55 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Anomalocaris - October 19, 2013 at 1:15 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 17, 2013 at 5:48 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 17, 2013 at 2:16 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 18, 2013 at 3:38 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 18, 2013 at 4:14 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 18, 2013 at 5:15 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by davidMC1982 - October 18, 2013 at 5:17 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Aractus - October 20, 2013 at 12:41 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 18, 2013 at 3:48 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by pocaracas - October 18, 2013 at 5:45 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Polaris - October 20, 2013 at 12:53 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Tiberius - October 22, 2013 at 2:15 am
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Polaris - October 24, 2013 at 9:35 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Neo-Scholastic - October 28, 2013 at 4:13 pm
RE: why does (-5)*(-4)=20 ?, eom - by Neo-Scholastic - October 28, 2013 at 5:35 pm



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)