(October 13, 2013 at 8:29 am)enrico Wrote: Gee, i can't believe!!!
Something that make sense.
Only one thing.
When you say........SCIENCE....... you intend physical science so write physical science.
There are people like me that believe in other types of science as well.
I don't need you to tell me what science is and is not. If you believe there are other ways to scientifically glean knowledge other the the established scientific method, either show how they work in the laboratory, or call them something else. But I'm pleased we agree on this point.
Quote:I am afraid that you create a dogma in your mind when you come to believe that if God incarnate he would only abide by natural laws.
I'm afraid you know nothing about me. And since my original post said nothing about incarnate gods, I'll repost my first reply to you, which apparently you missed, which does address incarnation:
Quote: If a god became incarnate- that is, in a physical body- it would seem that it would be bound by the limitations of bodies as we know them, since all bodies observed by the scientific method to date have not been incarnate gods and have been subject to natural phenomena. If the body was merely a puppet of a supernatural being, then all bets would be off, because, again, the supernatural being would be, by definition, outside of natural laws.
So it's a pointless thing to discuss, because when you claim a god is supernatural, asking someone to study it using the scientific method is farcical.