RE: The Jesus Itinerary
October 14, 2013 at 10:54 am
(This post was last modified: October 14, 2013 at 11:02 am by DeistPaladin.)
(October 14, 2013 at 10:14 am)John V Wrote: If that were true there'd be no problem. However, in this case you invented a claim to protest. That goes beyond skepticism, and does indeed indicate an agenda.No, I haven't invented. I've read what's there.
Quote:Key words bolded.Your point?
EDIT TO ADD: If it helps you understand, consider that my comments on the Kessel Run were also only a few sentences. This too was fan fic-ing to resolve a script blunder.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
