(October 15, 2013 at 1:54 am)Godschild Wrote: You have read into the story it was Joseph's house, your supposition has no support from the story.Aside from the fact that it's the logical conclusion barring any evidence in the story to the contrary, there's also the description of his forced relocation to Nazareth to avoid Herod's son (2:22). The narrative description in 2:23 of how he came to dwell in Nazareth is also consistent with the idea that he was coming to live there for the first time, not returning to his old home town. That's how I read it and I have three good reasons to do so.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
